Our manufacturing sites in Latin America (two in Brazil) and plants in Asia (six in China, one in Malaysia, one in Korea) mirror our European Union (EU) and the U.S. sites when it comes to product stewardship and product safety. We have local sites outside the EU and U.S. regions to better serve the local markets. In Latin America and Asia, we fully comply with local legislation and provide all necessary information to the appropriate organizations to support the manufacturing and use of our products. Globally, we adhere to the same high Eastman product stewardship standards, including safety standards.
Eastman has a dedicated Global Product Stewardship and Regulatory Affairs (PSRA) program which maintains a rigorous product safety review process that ensures review of the latest regulatory and toxicology information.
PSRA, working with research and development (R&D), is responsible for reviewing potential new products to avoid or reduce the use of potential substances of concern when technically feasible. Utilizing in silico tools and evaluating data for similar chemicals, PSRA provides information to R&D to identify the new chemistries with better safety profiles.
Eastman recognizes hazard classifications as described by the EU CLP regulation, the GHS classifications, IARC classifications, substances of very high concern (SVHC), REACH article 57 persistence criteria, POPs listed in the Stockholm Convention, as well as other regulatory and recognized hazard classifications.
At a frequency no less than annually, PSRA monitors certain governmental and nongovernmental lists (such as the SIN list) to identify substances of concern that could be present in internal processes including raw materials, process chemicals, intermediates or finished products. Timely monitoring and evaluating potential risk classifications drive Eastman’s goal to reduce or eliminate certain hazardous substances from its existing product portfolio. Those substances include PBT, vPvB, REACH persistent, CMR, ED, SoC and sensitizers. Reductions or eliminations will not be pursued when a less hazardous viable alternative does not yet exist, or the intended use poses no risk to the environment or its inhabitants.
Eastman acknowledges that chemical persistence in the environment is a critical concern particularly when substances exhibit persistent, bio accumulative, and toxic (PBT); very persistent and very bio accumulative (vPvB); persistent, mobile and toxic (PMT); or very persistent and very mobile (vPvM) properties. These characteristics can lead to long-term environmental and human health risks due to their resistance to degradation and potential for bioaccumulation.
Eastman recognizes that certain substance groups, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), are of particular concern due to their high persistence and potential adverse impacts. We actively monitor regulatory developments and scientific assessments related to such substances.
We define “persistent chemicals" as substances that remain in the environment unchanged for a long time and that meet any of the following criteria: persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (pbt), very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vpvb), persistent, mobile and toxic (pmt), very persistent and very mobile (vpvm) or persistent organic pollutant (pop).
One product, composed of a SVHC vPvB chemical, is used in closed and strictly controlled manufacturing conditions and is handled by professional workers. The fluid is enclosed in process lines and equipment, serving as a heat transfer fluid that is stable for 7 to 15-year timeframes. This product is not sold on the consumer market.
There are a limited number of Eastman products that contain persistent chemicals, either as impurities or intentionally added. Evaluations are currently underway to reduce or identify a suitable alternative when possible.
Less than 1% of revenue comes from Eastman Products that are classified as PBT/vPvB and less than 4% of revenue comes from products containing “persistent” chemicals at greater than 0.1%.